Despite challenges to the military campaign against ISIL, analysts are confident that victory is imminent.
The past six months have seen the reclaiming of some significant and symbolic territories from ISIL in both Syria and Iraq. With Coalition Forces stating that 20 percent of ISIL-held territory in Syria and 40 percent in Iraq were regained in 2015.
While Kurdish officials acknowledge the group's retreat, they nonetheless warn that any attempt to downplay the role Kurdish ground forces played in the war effort against ISIL will "only sow the seeds for future conflicts".
"The momentum of the recent successes against ISIL must not be lost, but in order for these successes to be maintained we must examine the root causes and make sure that there is an inclusive political process in conjunction with the military strategy to avoid further sectarian issues post-ISIL,"
Barham Salih, former Prime Minister of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), told Al Jazeera.
Salih was a keynote speaker at the Sulaimania Forum on the same topic in the Iraqi Kurdish city of Sulaimania on March 16-17.
The two-day forum, organised by the American University of Iraq-Sulaimani (AUIS), also included senior politicians, diplomats and analysts.But with Mosul and Raqqa still firmly in ISIL's grasp and territorial gains on their southern borders in Syria, just how close is victory?
Kurdish security experts have criticised the anti-ISIL coalition's reluctance to view Iraq and Syria as one arena when it comes to ISIL. ISIL fighters themselves pay little notice to national borders.
There has been some co-ordination between Kurdish forces across the frontlines in Iraq and Syria, with the People's Protection Units (YPG) forces forming a significant presence during the liberation of Sinjar in November last year and the KRG's Peshmerga joining the defence of Kobane.
Another factor that has hindered the military campaign is the lack of a truly unified command in Iraq or Syria. The internal political and sectarian divisions emerge as the various groups vie for influence in post-ISIL territorial gains.
Few - if any - of the local military forces are without partisan allegiances and agendas. A truly national agenda is lacking, making it much harder to create a well-coordinated and unified strategy.
Hayder al-Khoei, a research fellow at the London-based policy institute Chatham House, expressed a measure of optimism. "In some ways, ISIL has acted as a glue that has brought together their various and diverse enemies and created a more united front to confront them," he told Al Jazeera.
No comments:
Post a Comment